“There are no opponents in Zaire,
because the notion of opposition has no place in our mental universe. In fact, there are no political problems in
Zaire.” –Mobutu Sese Seko
...Not far from where we sat, a
paraplegic was busy capitalising on the latest twist in market forces. Helped by friends, he was struggling to
balance a pair of giant jerry cans filled with petrol onto the back of his
tricycle. At that moment, the militia
fighting in Brazzaville meant fuel there was scarce. Kinshasa’s petrol, itself in short supply,
should sell for a high price over the river, high enough, in any case, to
justify this polio victim running the risk of becoming a tricycling firebomb if
a cigarette spark went astray. “Thanks
to the war, I should be able to sell the petrol on the other side for twice the
price,” he said. “Then I’ll bring milk
back in the same jerry cans.”
...Depressingly, the people who led
the soldiers to the farm each time were local villagers. Far from regarding the farm as a project
worth encouraging, or at least tolerating, for the investment and employment it
might bring to the area, they monitored the farm through the years like
schoolboys watching a ripening fruit, waiting for the moment when a breakdown
of law and order would provide the cover for some neighbourly
appropriation... [The farmer] appeared
to harbour little rancour, attributing the repeated pillaging to the
hunter-gatherer instincts on which the Congolese relied for survival until so
very recently. But something... appeared
to have snapped [after the third looting], perhaps overwhelmed by the
realization that those around him had never regarded him as anything more than
just another white colonialist to be taken for a ride at worst, deferred to at
best.
...Between the start of the Zairean
economic crisis in 1975 and Mobutu’s departure in 1997, Zaire received a total
of $9.3 billion in foreign aid... The
corruption in Zaire, [Erwin Blumenthal] argues, is not a generalised blight, a
plague without face or source... Yet the
IMF and the World Bank were still giving Mobutu’s reform plans serious
consideration at the start of the 80s...
“There will certainly be new promises from Mobutu and the members of his
government and the ever-growing foreign debt will be rescheduled. But there is no – I repeat no – chance on the
horizon that Zaire’s many creditors will recover their funds.” ...By the time of the report, there had
already been four failed IMF stabilisation plans. But the rescheduling of Zaire’s debt went on
– nine times between 1976 and 1989.
...It was to take eight long years before the two institutions finally
reached the same conclusion as the testy German banker had spelled out in
1982: money was not the answer to
Zaire’s ills, rather, it lay at their very root.
...Mea culpa. Throughout my interviews, I had kept
expecting to find signs of it, only to be constantly surprised by its failure
to make an appearance. There was
precious little from the Washington financiers who granted billions to a known
thief, whose institutions will one day have to explain why the Congolese should
be held accountable for leans made in bad faith. Even less from the US and French officials
who, motivated by strategic reasons, decided with cool cynicism what was best
for this most fragile of post-independence states. There was none at all from the Congolese
aides, ministers and generals who helped mould [Mobutu’s] policies, still
adopting the ‘I was only following orders’ excuse judged insufficient at
Nuremberg. And... the colonial power
that first sent Congo on its wayward course had nimbly succeeded in dismissing
the very notion of blame. To explore the
roles they played – from the raids of the slave traders to the amputations
carried out by the Force Publique and the wishful thinking of the World Bank –
is to move from exasperation at a nation’s fecklessness to wonderment that a
population has come through it all with a sense of humour... Now that the US, France, and Belgium have
distanced themselves, now that Mobutu is dead, the country has lost the last
excuse for its predicament. A population
that has set its sights little higher than survival has to learn to take
responsibility for its own destiny.
‘What do the French want of Congo’
...alternated with the equally infuriating, if equally understandable
‘What do the Americans want?” ...must now become ‘What do the Congolese want?’
-- Wrong, M. (2000). In the
Footsteps of Mr. Kurtz. London: Fourth Estate, a division of HarperCollinsPublishers
If I could compile a
compulsory reading list for the next Seed cohort, it would consist of:
1.
King Leopold’s Ghost by Adam Hochschild
2.
In the Footsteps of Mr. Kurtz by Michela
Wrong
3.
Dancing in the Glory of Monsters: The Collapse of the Congo and the Great War
of Africa by Jason Stearns
In that order, no exceptions.
The sinusoidal wave from
the nightmares of Belgian colonialism to the often slightly hysterical
mismanagement of Mobutu, to the chaos of the human psyche in carrying out
genocides and war should prepare the team nicely for the seething insanity –
covered in a layer of genial greetings and four-part harmonies - that will meet
them here.
Please understand: I don’t mean to say that other countries are
any less vibrantly insane (believe me; I’m kind of Indian). Just perhaps that the Congo has greater
reason to be this way.
Or maybe I’m biased.
It all stems from the fact
that I want to be Michela Wrong when I grow up.
She manages to infuse a
generally insane dictator driving his country to ruin (with lots of help) with
a desperate sense to see his country – those he sees as his children - united
and successful, who used and was used by this ministers until greed and malice did
them part.
I don’t read
non-fiction. I especially don’t read
non-fiction to vaguely admire or pity despots.
I already love Snape (Brene Brown does too – vulnerability is the new
name of this girl’s game, baby) and I have no room in my heart for real-life
humans with their motivations and grey areas.
I want to hate The Bad
Guy.
Singular proper noun.
End of story.
But I can’t.
Every bad thing seems to
have coalesced into today, and everyone’s just been complicit in
watching it slide – as long as they receive a benefit - and it continues.
This country’s main import
has been foreign aid for a long time, in exchange for some of the world’s most
demanded minerals, and I still see the search for money rather than
change. The movers and shakers follow
the money: into corruption, into theft,
into NGOs, into exploitation, into churches...
I want to shake someone and
say, “This is crazy! Do you understand
that?!” But it’s really just
transference – I’d much rather grab my brain and shake until I don’t know my amygdala
from my hypothalamus, until all the knowledge I’ve managed to retain about the
Great Lakes settles and the truth drifts in gentle eddies to the top.
The truth is that corruption
is not okay, even if everyone else does it.
Stealing is not okay, even if you’re poor. Searching only for cases of horror, rape, and
trauma is not okay, even if it buys aid.
Supporting an ineffective, authoritarian government is not okay, even if
it ensures cheap resources, because the balancing weight is scores of lives eking
out a living far below the poverty line and under constant threat of
violence. But how to share this, how to
live it, when the country and its issues are not a part of me, not ingrained
into my skin?
This vast, horrible
knowledge is disturbed and broken by my small, daily, petty battles that I
cannot win - as I think about my responsibility to be a witness for Christ in
my workplace, in my organization, on my team, at home - when I, myself, am a
liar, a thief, a coward, and a lover of money...
Our house helper finally
left my bed alone. In a fit of thwarted
rage, he mopped the floors, washed one pot holder, and disposed of various
quantities of peanut butter, sunflower oil, olives, biscuits, and chocolate –
either in his stomach or in the garbage, I’m the last one to know.
I was in a snit of epic
proportions, never mind the fact that none of those items were mine (they
belonged to the previous owners of the apartment) – why would you eat the
peanut butter when all I want is for you to mop the floors one day a week? And one pot holder?!
He’s almost as bad as the
lizards who, having realized that I’m not very disturbed by them any longer, mostly
hide and leave poop in strategic locations.
But none of this jolted me
as badly as when I thought I saw a familiar face on my bus. I debated between confusion and morbid fear
for a while, finally settling on the latter when I decided he was the Burundian
suitor who’d accompanied me on the way over from Rwanda. I’d buried my Rwandan phone and refused to
add him on Facebook, for which I believe his memory will forever haunt me –
which is why when (I thought) I saw him in the flesh, I went into
convulsions. I convulsively threw my scarf
over my face, convulsed my way off the bus and past him wrapped like a mummy,
and convulsed home, where I found him climbing a chair to fix the wiring in our apartment and remembered that he was, in fact, our electrician.
In my defense, they vaguely
look alike.
You tell me how I’m supposed to contemplate the mysteries of the human condition in a recovering war zone when daily life is a psychological roller coaster.
No comments:
Post a Comment
At the risk of sounding desperate - PLEASE WRITE TO ME!