The Set-Up: A long-standing
partnership is straining at the seams due to the local organisation’s inability
to find sufficient additional funding.
It is debatable whether this is due to shady business practices or a
true inability to generate overseas interest in a vital peacebuilding
effort.
The Argument: “But I don’t want
to be the one to end this relationship.
If we pull funding, local employees will be laid off and we will break
ties with a hardworking community unique in its field. Anyway, we’ve been close to them too long to
back out now. Besides, maybe this time
will be different; they’ve been going through a difficult socio-economic
situation. What more can you expect?”
The Counter-Argument: You can expect
that if this happened in your home country, the organisation would be shelved
pending a restructuring and clarification of its practices, mission, and
strategic plan. You can expect to be
regretful, but hopeful that this focus on the proper means to achieve realistic
goals will result in more effective future intervention - which will better
serve vulnerable populations – rather than continuing on a tightrope of polite
omissions and great expectations.